"What I see is an interactive drama for the masses who have computers, but who are not 'gamers'." Randy Littlejohn
http://steel.lcc.gatech.edu/grandtextauto/archives/000138.html
So how does the re-mixable film idea mesh with the interactive fiction community? My idea is simply that this kind of film be re-purposable for the AI and IF folks to play with. We concentrate on making art and go the one extra step to provide a low level interface so it's of practical benefit to different communities. I think that will be enough of a challenge for SANCTUARY. What do you all think?
HfC was supposed to be re-purposable only BDE overestimated the capabilities of their software. Any notion of re-purposing Pan, his forest, and misc. other elements of the film went out the window when early tests came up nought. It wasn't possible to re-use Pan's head from the banner ad (our test) in the final movie the way we envisaged.
If this is going in the proposal, and probably even if it's not, you shouldn't really say they lied.
Posted by: ken at November 26, 2003 03:11 PMFair enough.
Posted by: .M. at November 26, 2003 03:55 PM